HRD Canada forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.

Notify me of new replies via email
HRM CA | 24 Jun 2015, 08:25 AM Agree 0
An employment dispute that began with allegations of ‘chronic lateness’ has ended up sapping six years form one employee’s life. And it isn’t over yet.
  • Jeannie McQuaid | 24 Jun 2015, 08:51 AM Agree 0
    Wow, it took Saltman 3 years to come up with the wrong decision.
  • Ruben Benmergui BA, MIR, LLM, CHRP, CHRL | 24 Jun 2015, 11:13 AM Agree 0
    " A six-year WRONGFUL DISMISSAL dispute" statement from an HR Site? Inexcusably distorted.
    1. This is a unionized employee. Wrongful dismissal does NOT apply. Dismissal without CAUSE does.
    2. Going to Court? Confusing! After the arbitration decision the only way to go to Court is Judicial review.
    3. No"back pay" ? This is at the Arbitrator's discretion.

    This coming from an HR Site?

    Give us a break.
Post a reply