Smokers need not apply

Smokers need not apply

Smokers need not apply

The president of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry Queensland (CCIQ) has come out swinging, sparking an age-old debate by accusing smokers of costing the state “millions and millions” of dollars in lost productivity each year.

David Goodwin from CCIQ has also questioned why industrial relations laws continue to ‘defy common sense’. "They (smokers) can't always make it up in their own time,'' he said. "If you miss that sales call because you're outside smoking, you've cost your organisation,” Goodwin told The Sunday Mail.

Australian Council on Smoking and Health professor Mike Daube added to the chorus of condemnation, adding that smokers have no entitlement to special consideration in the workplace.” They can manage without cigarettes on aircraft, in cinemas, churches and in a whole host of circumstances,” he said. “Work is no different. Staff are employed to work.”

See also: Help staff to quit smoking: a win-win

The criticism of smokers comes as more organisations start including a disclaimer in job ads that ‘smokers need not apply’. While it’s not unlawful, the practice has been labelled discriminatory and could mean missing out on excellent candidates.

Employers have for some time confined smokers to designated areas, moved smoking areas outside buildings, and limited smoking breaks. However, as some companies are now opting to push smokers out of the workplace altogether, acting commissioner of the Queensland Anti-discrimination Commission Neroli Holmes said denying someone a position because they were a smoker was “discriminatory, but not unlawful”. However, the practice could be a slippery slope, and Andrew Tarsy from the US-based Progressive Business Leaders Network questioned whether any such hiring policy is materially different from screening for other lifestyle-related behaviours, including being overweight and drinking alcohol.

See also: Smokers suck up $6000 extra a year

According to the Victorian Equal Opportunity Commission, to provide equal opportunities job advertisements must not be discriminatory and employers should not seek to exclude smokers from applying for a position, unless the need not to smoke is an inherent requirement of the role. Acting Commissioner Karen Toohey warned factors such as weight, height or smoking were not relevant to a person's ability to do their job. “Every employer should be looking for “the best person for a job,” she said.

Smoking breaks and productivity

Some employers are justified in hiring only non-smokers, according to Action on Smoking and Health Australia chief executive Anne Jones. “What is very understandable is that some workplaces are saying they don’t want smokers to apply because they see it as a productivity issue,” Jones previously The Herald Sun. She added that every workplace operates differently and some would be better off paying for employees to undergo quit courses.

One workplace lawyer said the practice of taking several 15 minute breaks a day is something many employers see as undermining productivity and it can be easily banned. “There is nothing stopping an employer asking a candidate if they smoke and how often,” Peter Vitalie said. “You can put into a contract that staff are not to smoke during office hours. You can also fix the time of people's breaks and request that in their break they do not leave your premises. There is no law that says you can't discriminate against smokers,” he added.

A representative from the Australian Human Rights Commission told HC that the issue is not covered in any of its legislation.

See also: Smokers spend a year 'lighting up'