“We are not anti-union” – GoodLife chief

by |
 
The COO of Canada’s largest fitness clubs has insisted the company is non anti-union and will do everything it can to empower employees to vote after receiving an application for certification earlier this week.

“It’s important to note that we are not anti-union at all, we are pro-employee,” said GoodLife Fitness’ Jane Riddell. “We respect our employees’ right to make their own decisions about union representation. We trust their judgement and whatever happens, we will respect the outcome.

“That being said, we absolutely believe that our employees do not need a union,” continued Riddell. “We believe in our open door communication policy and think its benefits have been demonstrated by the great growth and success we have all enjoyed.

“The bottom line is that we like dealing directly with our employees and having the privilege of treating each one of them as an individual,” she added.

Filed by the Workers’ United Canada Council, the application relates to a number of its clubs in Toronto and will affect over 1,500 personal trainers and group fitness instructors who will be asked to vote on unionization.

Riddell, who expects the Ontario Labour Relations Board to hold a vote early next week, pledged to support employees who wanted to vote.

“We want all of our employees to feel empowered to vote and we will do whatever we can to make this possible for them,” she promised.  “The decision about whether or not they will be unionized will be made by a majority of the people who actually vote, so we want everyone who will be impacted to have a say in the decision.”
 
More like this:

Two-day strike set to continue

Protests to be held over TFW program

“We never get the big kudos nationally.” 
  • Ian Ratchford on 2016-06-01 7:36:36 PM

    OMG! Not that I am surprised. Just can't believe this is happening. There are lots of complaints about management. Open door policy does not equal an open mind.

  • Nikki K on 2016-06-03 8:51:44 AM

    Worst place to work, no ESA compliance, breaking all the rules, not surprised this is happening.

  • Billy on 2016-06-23 3:27:05 PM

    I don't understand. Goodlife says they are not anti-union, yet they've asked the Ontario Labor Board to extend the voting area to include associates way outside of the area that the Union has applied to represent. Why? They expect these employees will dilute the yes vote.

  • Adrian on 2016-11-05 5:56:11 PM

    Yes, they asked the Ontario Labor Board to extend the voting area after associates voted for a Union. Before extended voting was carried out, associates were sent an email detailing GoodLife's argument why they didn't think their associates needed a Union.

HRM Online forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.

Name (required)
Comment (required)
By submitting, I agree to the Terms & Conditions