Interim CEO Ellen Pao insists the controversial move isn’t just a poorly-thought out display of authority – it’s about fostering transparency and fair pay.
Pau says that pay negotiations often put women at a disadvantage because men tend to negotiate more often – and more aggressively – than women.
“People who perform the same should be paid the same,” says Pau. “We want to make sure we maintain this level playing field.”
Linda Babcock – an economics professor at Carnegie Mellon University – says the policy does have the potential to help close the gender-pay gap but only if Reddit can stick to its guns across the board.
If they allow exceptions, “women will follow the rules, men will still try to negotiate, and if they are successful, that will further the gap. It could make things worse,” explained Babcock, who researches women and pay negotiation.
Research by both Babcock and Hannah Riley Bowles – a Harvard University lecturer who studies women and negotiation – has shown that men are about four times more likely than women to negotiate pay.
Not only that, but when women do negotiate pay, they’re viewed more unfavourably.
“Women’s reticence to negotiate is very real,” says Bowles.
On the up-side, it seems not all new hires are deterred when they hear offers are final – according to Pao, many admit that they like losing the added stress having to haggle can bring.
What do you think? Should new-hries have the right to negotiate or will a strict no-wiggle policy pave the way to pay equality? Share your thoughts below.
More like this:
Medical marijuana – it’s all about impairment
When to fire a star-employee who’s lost their spark
E-learning: don’t forget to support staff
Social-news site Reddit.com is one of San Francisco’s most desirable employers but there’s one thing that might put potential applicants off – the company point-blank refuses to negotiate pay with new hires.