Death of the Applicant Tracking System? One expert says yes

by |
Approximately 60% of global employers utilize some form of an applicant tracking system, yet experts worldwide agree that the strategic value of ATS is debatable at best.

Although the ATS was originally designed to simplify the hiring process and improve talent acquisition through better search and analytic functions, several issues have arisen from the technological solution. These include:
  • An unfriendly user interface.  Many candidates experience frustration entering information that should have been auto-populated, or struggle to list two previous positions under the same employer. 
  • Most applicant tracking systems fail to accept data that falls outside of U.S. cultural norms, such as a GPA that isn’t on a 4.0 scale or a postal code that isn’t a five-digit U.S. zip code.
  • No matter how spectacular the applicant, if certain key terms are omitted from a CV, that resume may never be viewed by a human.  “If your HR staff who do the ATS specs for your jobs don’t get it right, you spend a very good chance of bypassing high-potential talent who have the wrong keywords,” said Gary Taylor, Master HR practitioner with the South African Board for People Practice and vice president of the Institute of People Management.

In addition, because of the significant time and energy required by applicant tracking systems, many passive candidates forego the application process altogether.

Although a complete departure from ATS is unlikely, there are ways that HR can supplement the software tool in order to acquire top talent.  This includes effective candidate relationship building, employee-centered data analytics, and employer branding that appeals to the next generation of workers.
“It is still the employer’s need for screening, database searches, analytics, and even CRM campaigns that drives developments, ahead of the applicant experience,” said Taylor.
For more, click here.
  • Dan on 2015-01-06 4:34:19 PM

    I agree with a lot of the drawbacks of today's ATS. That's why LeoForce couples those core functions with recruiting robotics. One example, in response to your drawbacks, is LeoForce will automatically reply to candidates who are missing those "key terms" or "must-haves" to update their application if they do have that experience. I enjoyed this post! Thanks for sharing.

  • employAstar on 2017-02-17 6:54:27 AM

    I agree with you before there was lot of drawbacks in ATS. But now technology has improved and many new ATS software's are developed which are working good and may new features has bean developed which makes HR work easy. thanks for sharing.

HRM Online forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.

Name (required)
Comment (required)
By submitting, I agree to the Terms & Conditions