CFIA execs “grossly mismanaged” harassment complaints

CFIA execs “grossly mismanaged” harassment complaints

CFIA execs “grossly mismanaged” harassment complaints

Canada's federal public sector watchdog says two senior executives at the Canadian Food Inspection Agency committed ``gross mismanagement'' in their handling of three serious harassment complaints in 2014-15.

Joe Friday, the public safety integrity commissioner, draws that conclusion in a report tabled today in Parliament.

He says Bruce Archibald, the former president of the agency, and Gerard Etienne, then the body's vice-president of human resources, failed to take appropriate action to deal with complaints filed against an unidentified senior executive.

Archibald left the public service last fall and Etienne now is the agency's vice-president of operations.

The report says the two undermined the established complaints process and decided, in less than three days, not to investigate what Friday describes as serious allegations.

In addition to complaints about yelling and inappropriate comments, four agency executives sent a memo to Etienne outlining their own concerns about the same senior executive's behaviour.

Friday recommends that the agency ensure the complaints have been fully dealt with, review policies and training on harassment and explore whether it should turn such complaints over to an independent organization.

The agency has agreed with Friday's recommendations.

Friday said Archibald and Etienne circumvented the existing process.

``In the public sector workplace, harassment complaints must be taken seriously, especially when made against a senior executive occupying a position of significant responsibility and authority over employees,'' Friday said.

``The situation described in this case report involved three serious harassment complaints, yet no due diligence was shown in how they were handled.''

The ethics commissioner provides public servants and members of the public with an independent and confidential process for investigating disclosures of wrongdoing in the federal public sector and offers protection to whistleblowers.

1 Comments
  • Paula MacLean 2017-02-24 10:17:54 AM
    Why would the recommendation be "that complaints be fully dealt with"? That, I assume, was the policy and the executives decided to "undermine" and "not investigate". As an HR consultant, I've never written a recommendation that merely reflects what "should have been", I recommend what would ensure the policy would be followed the next time. The answer is not more policy or more training ... it is different leadership. An HR manager who does this, knows better. A senior exec who does it is defaulting on responsibilities. The only solution, is that they must be gone. One remains apparently ... what will be done now?
    Post a reply